We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission. Learn more›
Advice, staff picks, mythbusting, and more. Let us help you. Folder&Binder
We’ve updated this article to include information about choosing the right paper and printing process to ensure that prints can last well over 100 years.
Every few years during my childhood, my family and I would purge as much as possible from our overstuffed garage. But we could never bring ourselves to touch the big blue bin overflowing with stacks of photographs, its contents spanning several lifetimes’ worth of birthdays, vacations, and friendships.
Lately, whenever my mom brings up organizing the big blue bin, I suggest something drastic: Pick the five favorite photos from each year and trash the rest. After sorting through the houses of a few grandparents after their deaths, I’ve come to realize that print photographs can be a precious, tangible connection to previous generations. They also open a door to conversations about family with living relatives. But it’s easy for the important photos to get lost when people save too many.
In an age of boundless digital-photograph storage, it can feel a bit old-fashioned to worry about maintaining a print-photograph collection. But experts we spoke with from the Smithsonian Institution Archives and National Geographic agree: A print photograph can serve as a crucial backup to your digital collection and act as a way to interact with history, for this generation and for those to come.
“We don’t know what form digital photography is going to take in 100 years, or whether our grandchildren are going to access our hard drives or cloud accounts,” Smithsonian Institution Archives photograph archivist Marguerite Roby says. “I think there’s a big risk of losing a lot of digital photography, unless you’re really good at keeping up with it and making backups and printing your favorites.”
Photos you throw in a shoebox today are still likely to be in good condition in 30 years. But if you would like to give your photographs the best chance of lasting for hundreds of years, we offer a few techniques that professional archivists recommend. The goal is to find a photo-organization system that helps you see your most important photos more often and in a more fulfilling way.
This print lab offers the best combination of quality, price, options, and service, and it uses paper that should last over 100 years in dark storage.
Photograph-printing technology has changed a lot over the past century, and the truth is, no one knows how photos printed today will look in 200 years. Photos from the 1950s tend to turn red over time, while pictures from the 1970s take on a yellow tinge, according to Roby. Pictures from the 2020s may reveal their own distinct signature.
Still, it’s a good idea to look for a printing service that excels at producing high-quality photos. At Wirecutter, we prefer Nations Photo Lab for its color accuracy and detail, though we found the differences among most photo-printing services to be slim.
Nations uses two brands of photo paper: Kodak Professional Endura Premier Photo paper and Fujifilm Fujicolor Crystal Archive Super Type PDN. Both the Kodak paper (PDF) and the Fujifilm paper (PDF) have been rated to last for more than 100 years in dark storage.
This printer consistently delivers excellent prints with long-lasting pigment inks. It also offers a user-friendly color touchscreen. Be aware that it ships with less-than-full ink cartridges.
If you choose to print at home, the top pick in our photo printer guide, the Epson SureColor P700, makes prints rated to last (PDF) more than 200 years on any of Epson’s fine-art photo papers.
It’s just as important to pick the right photos to print. Your digital-photo library might be an exhausting quagmire of priceless moments mixed in with food shots from long-forgotten restaurants. But a print-photograph collection is most useful if it is curated. Consider how many photographs you would like to leave to your children; saving just 10 photographs a year blooms to a collection of 800 if you live to be 80.
“You can find thousands of pictures of the Eiffel Tower, but only this one of you in it,” Roby says. “That has more historical importance.” A good rule of thumb for determining which photos to keep is to consider whether an image holds both personal and historical value. Put on your best Marie Kondo voice and ask yourself whether the photograph sparks joy. Then consider whether the faces in the photograph are in focus and large enough to recognize. A place of interest in the background (such as a family home or cityscape) or an important event (like a wedding) can add merit.
Whether you prefer to stack photos in a box or arrange them in an album, it’s best to look for a storage option that’s free of acid and lignin (an acidic compound that gives trees their rigidity). It’s also good to avoid dyes and recycled materials. That rules out shoeboxes. Instead, consider Archival Methods’s Short Top Boxes, which are stackable, made from boxboard, and available in several sizes. You may be tempted to use a clear plastic box that’s advertised as being acid-free. But Smithsonian Institution Archives conservator William Bennett advises against that because at this point no one knows how plastic interacts with photographs over the course of a century. It’s safer to use time-tested paper boxes.
The same wisdom applies to photo albums. Avoid exposing your photographs to any glue or other adhesives. Since you’re unlikely to find an album that has paper sleeves, look for an album that has acid-free plastic sleeves, like the Pioneer Photo Albums 3-Ring Photo Album. The binder style has the advantage of being easier to reorganize as you add and remove pages.
If a photo is already deteriorating or especially precious, Roby recommends using a Mylar sleeve for extra protection. Talas Mylar Sleeves are acid-free and available in standard photo sizes.
It may be obvious to you that a beloved photograph depicts your child playing in your backyard, but it won’t be as clear to future generations. Pairing a photo with the who, what, where, when, and why—also known as metadata—gives it historical context.
“A lot of people are researching their family history. That’s the first place you can start, with those family photographs,” National Geographic senior image archivist Susie Riggs says. “You have to capture that information from the older generation immediately and keep sharing. Keep looking at those photographs and remember who they were, because they’re part of your personal history.”
Writing directly on the back of a photograph can damage it, due to pressure from the tip of your writing utensil, or as the ink degrades and interacts with the paper over the years. Instead, use a separate slip of paper. We like Archival Methods’s All-Purpose Index Cards because they are acid- and lignin-free, so they are less likely to damage photos. They also come with lines for important information such as date, subject, and place. You can slip them behind a photograph in an album or slot them into a box between images.
This inexpensive pencil is made of premium incense cedar. It is comfortable to hold and has a neatly painted exterior.
It may come as a surprise, but archivists actually favor pencils over pens for durability. The lead is less likely to fade over time or interact in a harmful way with a photograph. It’s possible to purchase archival-quality pencils, but National Geographic image archivist Rebecca Dupont suggests a good old-fashioned No. 2. The Palomino Golden Bear #2 (Blue) pencil is our pick because it writes smoothly, sharpens well, and is comfortable to hold.
If you must write on the back of a photograph, Dupont says it’s still a good idea to use a pencil instead of a pen. Write lightly around the edges to avoid damaging the focus of the photograph at the center. Once you are finished writing, avoid touching the pencil marks; although lead is more likely than ink to avoid fading, it isn’t impervious to being smudged away.
No matter how you store and label your photographs, the single most important thing you can do is select a safe location for them. Photo collections should be kept in climate-controlled areas that are not too hot, cold, or humid. That generally means storing them in your living space instead of in an unfinished basement or attic. Dupont recommends an upstairs closet, where photos are less likely to be affected by flooding, and where a door will protect them from exposure to sunlight.
Also, when you store photographs in an easy-to-access place, you’ll interact with them more. Build a gallery wall in your home, and swap photos in and out regularly. Place some photos out on a table at your next family gathering.
“It does take time to think about these pictures and remember them, and that’s part of the fun,” Riggs says. “This isn’t a way to put things away. This is a way to have them be seen more.”
Phil Ryan contributed reporting. This article was edited by Jason Chen and Erica Ogg.
by Ben Keough and Kaitlyn Wells
The HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e is our favorite all-in-one thanks to its ease of use, great print quality, and low cost of operation.
by Erin Roberts and Phil Ryan
If you want to make high-quality, long-lasting photo prints at home, the Epson SureColor P700 is the best photo printer to buy.
Our pick for the best instant photo printer is simple to use, and it’s light and small enough to carry. It uses easy-to-find, affordable film, too.
The simple design, high-quality results, free cloud storage, and $0 price make Adobe Scan an excellent choice.
4x4 Photo Album Wirecutter is the product recommendation service from The New York Times. Our journalists combine independent research with (occasionally) over-the-top testing so you can make quick and confident buying decisions. Whether it’s finding great products or discovering helpful advice, we’ll help you get it right (the first time).